A Logical Interpretation of RDF

نویسندگان

  • Wolfram Conen
  • Reinhold Klapsing
چکیده

The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is intended to be used to capture and express the conceptual structure of information offered in the Web. Interoperability is considered to be an important enabler of future web applications. While XML supports syntactic interoperability, RDF is aimed at semantic interoperability. Interoperability is only given if different users/agents interpret an RDF data model in the same way. Important aspects of the RDF model are, however, expressed in prose which may lead to misunderstandings. To avoid this, capturing the intended semantics of RDF in first-order logic might be a valuable contribution and may provide RDF with a formalization allowing its full exploitation as a key ingredient of the evolving semantic Web. This paper seeks to express the concepts and constraints of the RDF model in first-order logic.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Knowledge representation in RDF/XML, KIF, Frame-CG and Formalized-English

This article shows how RDF/XML, KIF, Frame-CG (FCG) and Formalized-English (FE) can be used in a panorama of knowledge representation cases. It highlights various inadequacies of RDF/XML, advantages provided by high-level expressive notations (FCG and FE), and the KIF translations provide a logical interpretation for the other notations. Knowledge providers may see this document as a guide for ...

متن کامل

Logical Reconstruction of Normative RDF

In this sketchy paper we introduce a logical reconstruction of the RDF family of languages and the OWL-DL family of languages. We prove that our logical framework is equivalent to the normative W3C definitions of RDF/RDFS and OWL-DL/Lite. The main aim is to have a unified model theoretic semantics for both worlds. As a consequence we get various complexity results and a model theoretic semantic...

متن کامل

Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide

This paper compares the semantics (or stated more precise: an interpretation of the intended semantics) of RDF [11] and RDFS [4] (as previously captured in [5]) with the semantics defined by the new upcoming RDF Model Theory [9]. While the RDF Model Theory Draft (MT) relies on set theory, we interpret the MT utilizing a horn subset of first order logic. On one hand, this may facilitate comprehe...

متن کامل

Inference rules for RDF(S) and OWL in N3Logic

This paper presents inference rules for Resource Description Framework (RDF), RDF Schema (RDFS) and Web Ontology Language (OWL). Our formalization is based on Notation 3 Logic, which extended RDF by logical symbols and created Semantic Web logic for deductive RDF graph stores. We also propose OWL-P that is a lightweight formalism of OWL and supports soft inferences by omitting complex language ...

متن کامل

Logical Reconstruction of RDF and Ontology Languages

In this sketchy paper we introduce a logical reconstruction of the RDF family of languages and the OWL-DL family of languages. We prove that our logical framework is equivalent to the standard W3C definitions of RDF and OWL-DL/Lite. The main aim is to have a unified model theoretic semantics for both worlds. As a consequence we get various complexity results and a model theoretic semantics for ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000